Stated position 03 of 10

Foreign policy and the national interest

The foreign policy objective argues that government should serve British citizens before international institutions. Its defence claims rest on force-size figures a reader can verify directly against MOD statistics.

Primary sourceThe policy paper

Attribution matters: this page summarises the Restore Britain policy paper titled “Put British Interests First”, dated 13 February 2026. The headline wording and framing are the party’s own; the summary below reports the published position and does not ask the reader to accept its diagnosis, evidence or remedy without checking the sources.

What the paper publishes

The proposals, in summary.

Condensed from the policy paper. Wording in quotation marks is the paper’s own; everything else is this site’s plain-English summary of it.

Read the full paper at restorebritain.org.uk
  • End foreign aid spending that is not judged to advance Britain's national interest.
  • Rebuild and rearm the armed forces — the paper's own phrasing is that Britain “will have a big stick”.
  • Abolish diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives across government departments, singling out the Ministry of Defence.
  • Focus military recruitment on what the paper calls the native majority population.
  • Reduce reliance on international alignments in favour of independently pursued strategic goals.
The paper in full

The complete text, as published.

Reproduced verbatim from the Restore Britain policy paper dated 13 February 2026 so the position can be read whole, not just in summary. Every claim, figure and turn of phrase below is the party’s own; only the formatting has been simplified.

Original pagerestorebritain.org.uk

Put British Interests First.

Too many within the British political establishment are more interested in serving the world, international institutions, or foreign states than pursuing our own national interest. A Restore Britain government would bring this globalist approach to a resounding end.

On everything from military aid to the deployment of our armed forces, the interests of the British people would forever be our solemn priority.

We agree with the 19th century statesman Lord Palmerston, who once declared: “We have no eternal allies, and we have no perpetual enemies. Our interests are eternal and perpetual, and those interests it is our duty to follow.”

All forms of foreign aid that do nothing to advance Britain’s national interests in the world would be scrapped.

Rebuild and rearm Britain. We will have a big stick, and we will wave it whenever we see fit to do so.

End DEI within Britain’s armed forces.

A Restore Britain government would abolish every trace of DEI across all government departments. Nowhere does this matter more than within the Ministry of Defence.

Recently, it emerged that Andrew Harwin, an RAF squadron leader, instructed staff back in 2021 to stop selecting “useless white male pilots” for training courses. This was not an isolated scandal. In 2022, it became undeniable that under Sir Mike Wigston, who has since resigned, the RAF actively discriminated against white men – a self-defeating crusade for which the new head of the force, Sir Richard Knighton, later apologised. Nevertheless, DEI targets remain in place.

The British army, tasked with the urgent duty of defending the realm, has shrunk by 40% since 2010. We now boast a mere 70,000 enlisted soldiers.

At Restore Britain, we believe that success in battle is not only a matter of how well a man can fight, but what he is willing to fight for. The most fearsome soldier in the world is not only worthless but harmful if his loyalties commit him to siding with the enemy.

As well as a powerhouse of soldierly talent, the British army should be a place for young men to live out their sense of duty to their own people. In Britain, that will mean focussing recruitment efforts on the native majority.

This occurs in almost every other nation on the planet, because it is a more reliable way to fill depleted ranks than fishing for minorities who may be commendable as individuals, but whose roots here will be shallow by comparison and their ties to Britain relatively weak.

The stated diagnosis

The problem as the party frames it.

The paper contends that the political establishment prioritises international institutions and foreign states over its own citizens, and that DEI policy has weakened military effectiveness. It cites a claim that the army has shrunk by roughly forty per cent since 2010.

Force-strength figures are published quarterly by the MOD, and aid spending is published in detail by the FCDO — both claims are directly checkable.

How to test this position

  1. 1
    Verify the force figures

    MOD quarterly personnel statistics record actual army strength over time. Does the paper's claimed decline match the published series?

  2. 2
    Define the test

    “National interest” is doing all the work here. What criteria would decide which aid programmes or alliances pass it?

  3. 3
    Price the rearmament

    What spending level is proposed, over what timetable, and how does it compare with current defence budgets?

  4. 4
    Track the record

    Compare with Mr Lowe's Commons contributions on defence and foreign affairs.

Go to the original material

Sources for this position

Positions can change and summaries can drift. These are the living sources to read before quoting or relying on this page.